Friday, August 19, 2016

2016 Microeconomics FRQ #3


You should have been able to recognise that the business above is in a monopolistically competitive market - differentiated products, no barriers to entry.

(A) Draw a CLG showing Camden's demand curve, marginal revenue curve, marginal cost curve, and long-run average total cost curve. Label Camden's profit maximising output Qm & Pm.


(B) On your graph in part (a) label the output at which total revenue is maximised QR.

Max revenue is where MR = 0, at that quantity revenue is maximised.



(C) Do firms in this market experience economies of scale, diseconomies of scale, or neither in long-run equilibrium? Explain.

College Board! "YOU SICK BASTARD"!
Refer back to the EOS - Economies of Scale post


Notice that where MR=MC intersect and we find our price and quantity the LRATC curve is sloping downward. This is the section of the LRATC (long run average total cost curve) where resource prices are decreasing in the industry. It's a decreasing cost industry or an increasing returns industry or this industry is experiencing economies of scale.





Monday, August 8, 2016

2016 AP Microeconomics Exam FRQ#2

2016 AP Microeconomics Exam FRQ#2
(A) What is Martha’s marginal benefit of the fifth unit of good X?    


At a quantity of 0, we haven’t purchased any units so there is no marginal benefit.
As we purchase from 0 quantity to the first unit of X, we gain a marginal benefit of $16.
As we purchase from the first to the second unit of X, we gain a marginal benefit of $12.
As we purchase from the second to the third unit of X, we gain a marginal benefit of $8.
As we purchase from the third to the fourth unit of X, we gain a marginal benefit of $4.
As we purchase from the fourth to the fifth unit of X, we gain a marginal benefit of $1.

Think of marginal as meaning the next purchase. Obviously we can only purchase full units, so when we have 4 units purchased our next marginal purchase is the 5th one and we receive a marginal benefit of $1 from the additional/marginal purchase of that 5th unit.


(B) Calculate the total consumer surplus if Martha consumes 5 units of X. (show your work)

Remember, that consumer surplus is the additional value gained from consumption of a good subtracting what has been paid for that good.

Answer - Total Consumer Surplus = $12 + $8 + $4 + $0 + $ -3 = $21 of Total Consumer Surplus

·      Understand that the $4 Cost is also part of the benefit. Confusing at first, but understand that if I give you $4 for unit X then unit X is still worth $4, at least to me.


       

(C) Martha is currently consuming 4 units of X and 2 units of Y. Use marginal analysis to explain why this combination is not optimal.


This combination of Units X and Units Y are not optimal as the marginal benefit gained from purchasing units X and Y is not equal.

We are use to seeing these problems as Utility problems and recognizing that the Marginal Benefits and Marginal Utility formula’s are the same.



(D) What is Martha’s optimal combination of X & Y?           

1st – using the formula set the two goods equal by using the formula above. Table is helpful. (:

2nd – Martha chooses her purchases according to the greatest benefit gained with each purchase.

3rd – Martha purchases until her income is all spent.



E) Indicate whether each of the following will cause the optimal quantity of good Y to increase, decrease or stay the same.

(I) The price of good Y doubles.

If the benefit per unit of Y decreases, then we would purchase less of the good.  Martha’s first purchase would have been X as the benefit is 4, which is greater than the benefit of 2.5 for a unit of Y.

Answer - The optimal quantity purchased will decrease.

(II) Martha’s income falls to $10 with no change in prices.

If Martha’s income falls to $10, then she will not be able to purchase 4 units of good Y.
She will purchase the first 3 units of good X & Y exactly the same way, but then she has spent $8 and only has $2 left, so she will then only be able to purchase a unit of Y.

So 1 unit of X and 3 units of Y will be purchased, this will use all of her income. The question above asks if the optimal quantity of good Y will decrease, increase, or stay the same.

Originally Martha, with $20 of income bought 4 units of good Y, so her purchase of good Y has decreased.

Answer – Martha’s purchase of good Y has decreased.

(III) Martha’s income doubles and the price of both goods double.

The answer to this question should be intuitive in that if Martha’s income doubles and all goods prices double then Martha is no better off with a doubling of her income as the ratio of prices to incomes are the same.

3 units of X at $8 each is $24 spent and 4 units of Y at 4 each is $16 and $24 + $16 = $40
Martha has spent $40 (all) of her income and bought the same combination of goods X & Y.

Answer - No change in optimal combination of goods X & Y.









Tuesday, July 5, 2016

2016 AP Microeconomics FRQ # 1

2016 AP Microeconomics FRQ # 1

Watch me answer it here


(A) In the market for bananas, the equilibrium price is $1.00 per pound, and the equilibrium quantity is 1,000 pounds per week. Suppose the government imposes a price floor on bananas at $1.20 per pound, causing the quantity supplied to increase to 1,500 pounds a week.    
(I) Would the price floor result in a shortage, a surplus, or neither? Explain.
The price floor causes the price to increase, which sends a signal to producers (suppliers) to produce more but consumers will reduce their purchases due to the higher price causing the quantity demand to decrease. So, a surplus would occur.



(II) Calculate the price elasticity of supply if the price increases from $1 to $1.20 per pound. Show your work.
Use either the midpoint formula or the alternative formula as the College Board accepts both.

Midpoint Formula     Alternative Formula










(III) Between $1 & $1.20, is the supply elastic, unit elastic, or inelastic? Explain.

From the Elasticity - cheat sheet,
So, a PES of 2 or 2.5 is obviously greater than 1 and therefore is Elastic.


(B) Bananas are an input for muffins.
     
(I) Draw a correctly labeled graph (CLG) of the market for muffins indicating the equilibrium price and quantity, labeled P0 & Q0, respectively.


(II) On the graph drawn in part (B) (I), show the increase in the price of banana's on the muffin market, labelling P1 & Q1.

 
An increase in the price of bananas is considered an increase in input cost for muffins as bananas are an input (resource) cost for muffins. Therefore the price of muffins will increase and the quantity of muffins sold will decrease.




(III) On the same graph, completely shade the area that represents the change in the consumer surplus caused by the change in the price of bananas.

(C) In the market for coffee, the equilibrium price is $3.00 per cup and the equilibrium quantity is a 100 cups per week. The cross-price elasticity of coffee with respect to muffins is -2.

(I) Are coffee and muffins normal goods, inferior goods, complimentary goods or substitute goods?


Coffee and muffins are complementary goods.

(II) Assume the supply of coffee is perfectly elastic. Using the equilibrium price and quantity given above, draw a correctly labelled graph for the coffee market and show the impact of the increase in the price of muffins on the coffee market.



(III) Given the original quantity 100 cups of coffee per week, if the increase in the price of muffins is 10%, calculate the new equilibrium quantity in the coffee market. Show your work.

The cross-price elasticity is the responsiveness of the quantity demand to a change in price. 

As the price of muffins goes up by 10% the demand for coffee will decrease as muffins and coffee are compliments. Recognise that the price of coffee does not increase as the supply is perfectly elastic.

The question is to calculate the new quantity sold in the coffee market.












Monday, June 20, 2016

Good Year, Good Students, Good Times

Good Year, Good Students, Good Times

Thanks for working so hard this year and good luck.